What if what we thought, and held most dear, about the fundamentals of physical science was wrong? That atoms and quantum particles were not what we believed them to be. That planets, star systems and the Universe itself had a far more intrinsic correlation to the material structure that fundamentally constituted those systems. What if our most cutting edge mainstream theoretical theories were completely off track? What if? This is what my own research in science has lead me to strongly question and it has been an interesting journey.

Some years ago while playing with physics, fractals and comparisons, out of sheer curiosity, * I derived a scale relationship between star systems and atoms based on a comparison between our Solar System and the Beryllium atom*. The demotion of Pluto was the quintessential insight needed in choosing the Be atom. Why the Be atom? What Pluto’s demotion made evident was that our

*. The number 4 was curiously interesting, so much so that it was assumed to match the atomic number of an atom, or a cosmological atomic number.*

**Solar System had a unique case of 4 rock planets in the inner system and 4 gas giant planets in the outer system (by classification)***. This yielded a*

**The atom with an atomic number of 4 was Be***based on average measured radii of our Solar System (77.5AU) and Be (105pm). It was subsequently discovered that this scale value was equal in value (not dimensionally) to c^e which only added mystery and compounded curiosity to this scale relationship. It was assumed that velocity played a role in this scale relationship “somehow” and that at the velocity of v=c, the 1.1025E23 scaling factor was achieved transforming a star system into an atom. From this scale value alone several simple transform equations were derived (length, matter density and mass). A time transform equation was derived some time after using object velocity ratios between the two scales. Stressing the equations were easily derived (so elementary anyone could replicate the results), from the mass equation, Jupiter’s cosmological mass became extremely close to the numerical value of an electron charge (1.6022E-19) with a margin of error of 2.6%. Since then many more amazing results have emerged, many of which are exact. This was the start of my trip down the rabbit hole and my personal quest to discover what’s at the other end.*

**scale value S (1.1025E23)**In order to classify and distinguish this work, the bulk of it has been titled “Fractal Scaling Cosmology Framework (FSC)”. It is a unique cosmological fractal relative scaling framework. Originally this research was titled “Realitivistic Relativity (RR)”, which stands for “real” Relativity, but because this framework actually supports and extends traditional Relativity (SRT/GRT), and more importantly goes far beyond Relativity into the fields of macroscopic and quantum cosmology, the framework was justly re-titled FSC. All this research has been nationally archived and is available to all to reference and do their own research.

The current framework was derived using a very logically clear process, is very simple and is extremely predictive. It is still a work in progress and is being extended to include all known associated physical phenomena, but as it stands currently, there are many remarkable results derived from this framework. The following is a clear list of these results along with some classic analogies between the cosmological and quantum realms as expressed by scientific icons such as Rutherford, Bohr and even Heaviside. To clarify, this framework is not based on the Rutherford or Bohr model, but on actual star systems, including our Solar System, and all their associated characteristics.